<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Sitecore prefetch cache	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.boro2g.co.uk/sitecore-prefetch-cache/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.boro2g.co.uk/sitecore-prefetch-cache/</link>
	<description>Some ideas about coding, dev and all things online.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2017 10:14:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: boro		</title>
		<link>https://blog.boro2g.co.uk/sitecore-prefetch-cache/#comment-597151</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[boro]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2017 10:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.boro2g.co.uk/?p=517#comment-597151</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.boro2g.co.uk/sitecore-prefetch-cache/#comment-597150&quot;&gt;Cristi Boboc&lt;/a&gt;.

These sort of things are probably worth bringing up with support. In the past we&#039;ve run diagnostics onto the db&#039;s and found in the most part that the indexes we&#039;d expect are in place. 

One set of queries which we&#039;ve seen to cause lots of rows being returned relate to when you have lots of languages and lots of versions as you get back fields for every permutation.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These sort of things are probably worth bringing up with support. In the past we&#8217;ve run diagnostics onto the db&#8217;s and found in the most part that the indexes we&#8217;d expect are in place. </p>
<p>One set of queries which we&#8217;ve seen to cause lots of rows being returned relate to when you have lots of languages and lots of versions as you get back fields for every permutation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Cristi Boboc		</title>
		<link>https://blog.boro2g.co.uk/sitecore-prefetch-cache/#comment-597150</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cristi Boboc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2017 09:08:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.boro2g.co.uk/?p=517#comment-597150</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Have you never been interested in why sitecore is issuing checks like &quot;... [ItemId] IN (SELECT [ID] ...&quot; which are performing extremely bad? Such kind of SQL statements make the database to work well up to hundreds of records but can show noticeable performance drops when tables reac even thousands of rows! Not to speak when they accumulate hundreds thusands of rows or even more!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you never been interested in why sitecore is issuing checks like &#8220;&#8230; [ItemId] IN (SELECT [ID] &#8230;&#8221; which are performing extremely bad? Such kind of SQL statements make the database to work well up to hundreds of records but can show noticeable performance drops when tables reac even thousands of rows! Not to speak when they accumulate hundreds thusands of rows or even more!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
